Re: Big repo not shrinking on repack or gc?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Andreas Krey <a.krey@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:05:46 +0000, Bryan Turner wrote:
> ...
>
> They do. So it seems it was forked once upon a time, but...
>
> /opt/apps/atlassian/stash-data/shared/data/repositories $ grep '' */objects/info/alternates
> 158/objects/info/alternates:/data/opt_apps/atlassian/stash-data/shared/data/repositories/20/objects
> 45/objects/info/alternates:/data/opt_apps/atlassian/stash-data/shared/data/repositories/33/objects
> 93/objects/info/alternates:/data/opt_apps/atlassian/stash-data/shared/data/repositories/91/objects
>
> ...there is no trace of a fork still existing (the repo in question is 143).

Yes, the system doesn't currently detect when a repository becomes
un-forked because it's not a common use case.

At this point I think we should probably take this off-list. You can
either e-mail me directly (bturner at atlassian dot com), or, better
still, raise a ticket on support.atlassian.com. Either way I'll work
with you directly to un-fork the repository on disk and allow it to
clean itself up.

>
> Andreas
>
> --
> "Totally trivial. Famous last words."
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]