Have you looked at git show-branch --all? ...Johan On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Yuri D'Elia <wavexx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > git log --graph is hard for me to parse mentally when developing a > project which has a lot of branches. > > All the tools I've been using seem to just parse log --graph's output, > and thus are no better at showing history. > > I would love to have a graph mode where each branch is assigned a > column, and stays there. If my log section shows the history of 3 > branches, column 1 should always refer to master, 2 to the hypothetical > "development" branch and 3 to "feature". > > Of course the mode will waste more horizontal space, but it would be > immediately more apparent which branch is merging into which. > > I saw this idea proposed a couple of times in the mailing list, but I > saw no "action" behind the proposal. Since I don't have time to work on > it, has anyone already started some work that he would like to share as > a starting point? Even just to have a felling if it's worth the effort. > > Does anybody know of another tool to graph the history using something > that is not based on git log --graph? > > I've seen a couple of graphviz-based ones, but both failed to work out > of the box for me. > > Thanks a lot for any pointer. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html