Re: Question about the revision walking API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I am not sure what you describe above would work, but something like
> what is done in bisect.c should work, see check_ancestors() and
> bisect_next_all(). It might not be the most efficient solution though,
> so I am interested if you find something more efficient.

I do not think what bisect does is a correct solution for general
case; I didn't check too carefully when I applied your patch long
time ago, but I recall that you only clear flag bits from commits
that are still in the pending queue in that codepath.  That may be
sufficient if the subsequent traversal goes only outside the area
previous traversal walked, but the approach is inappropriate for
general cases, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]