Re: Questions about git-rev-parse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:
> 
> Funny; I'd always guessed that it came from Lord of the Rings, which (I think) 
> often mentioned "Ent-ish" as being the language of the trees.

Yeah, we for a while had that overly geekish thing, but we didn't use 
"entish", we used just "ent". Because an "ent" is "tree-ish".

So when we used "ent", we didn't have the "-ish" there at all, and at some 
point all the ents got search-and-replaced into "tree-ish".

But "treeish" actually came before, and the "ent" thing was just a 
temporary pun that got dropped.

Looking at the git log, the first time we use "tree-ish" is fairly early: 
apparently May 5, 2005. Commit ac4e0869 introduces it instead of 
<tree/commit> (probably because the tag part got added, and to explain 
that we only care about the resulting tree and won't actually *use* any 
of the commit/tag information except to get to it).

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]