On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:40:54AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > You spell "--thin-aggressive" as two words, "--thin" "--shallow", in > this series, essentially, no? Essentially, yes. It became obligatory after I noticed the test failure, since that test actually checks whether the remote side sends a shallow-optimized pack. > I think this is going in the right direction. The "shallow" > propagated on the wire from the fetcher is the right thing to use > to make this decision. > > I wonder if the call to is_repository_shallow() is still necessary > (read: I would prefer to see it go away) where we decide between > "--objects-edge" and "--objects-edge-aggressive". Okay. I'll try to push it up the stack a little bit. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature