Re: [PATCH 16/18] fsck: support demoting errors to warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I suspect that it would be much better if the configuration
> variables were organized the other way around, e.g.
>
> 	$ git config fsck.warn missingTagger,someOtherKindOfError

By the way, I think I like this organization is much better than the
other way around, i.e. "fsck.missingTagger=warn", as we do not want
the namespace under fsck.* for variables that control the behaviour
of fsck that are *NOT* kinds of questionable conditions fsck can
find.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]