Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I accidentally created a branch whose name starts with "+". > Everything went ok until I pushed it because "+" is interpreted as > forced refspec (e.g. "git push somewhere +wip"). Using full ref names > would avoid ambiguity. The corner case of this is where the branch > name is simply "+". Then refspec "+:" will be interpreted completely > different from what the user wants. Using full ref names does not avoid ambiguity in that case? What is a push refspec with an empty right-hand-side supposed to do in the first place anyway? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html