After queuing these three, I _think_ it is better to have something
like this patch on top, as it is distracting to let the GPG message
while setting up the test gpghome leak into the test output,
especially without running these tests with "-v" option.
The splitting of RFC1991 prerequiste part is about future-proofing.
When we want to define other kinds of specific prerequisites in the
future, I'd prefer to see it done separately from the basic set-up
code.
Thanks.
t/lib-gpg.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/lib-gpg.sh b/t/lib-gpg.sh
index b611b78..33de402 100755
--- a/t/lib-gpg.sh
+++ b/t/lib-gpg.sh
@@ -16,23 +16,25 @@ else
# Type DSA and Elgamal, size 2048 bits, no expiration date.
# Name and email: C O Mitter <committer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
# No password given, to enable non-interactive operation.
- mkdir ./gpghome
- chmod 0700 ./gpghome
- GNUPGHOME="$(pwd)/gpghome"
- export GNUPGHOME
- gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" --import \
- "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/keyring.gpg
- gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" --import-ownertrust \
- "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/ownertrust
+ mkdir ./gpghome &&
+ chmod 0700 ./gpghome &&
+ GNUPGHOME="$(pwd)/gpghome" &&
+ export GNUPGHOME &&
+ gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" 2>/dev/null --import \
+ "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/keyring.gpg &&
+ gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" 2>/dev/null --import-ownertrust \
+ "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/ownertrust &&
test_set_prereq GPG
- if echo | gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -b --rfc1991 >/dev/null 2>&1
- then
- test_set_prereq RFC1991
- fi
;;
esac
fi
+if test_have_prereq GPG &&
+ echo | gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -b --rfc1991 >/dev/null 2>&1
+then
+ test_set_prereq RFC1991
+fi
+
sanitize_pgp() {
perl -ne '
/^-----END PGP/ and $in_pgp = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html