Re: [PATCH v2] doc: make clear --assume-unchanged's user contract

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@xxxxxxx>
From: "Sérgio Basto" <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Sáb, 2014-12-06 at 15:04 +0000, Philip Oakley wrote:
Many users misunderstand the --assume-unchanged contract, believing
it means Git won't look at the flagged file.
[...]
retrospect, so my patch seeks to clarify the existing situation. That is "please git, update the index, you can assume these files are unchanged ... ".
... and if you don't trust me, then you can even go and check [Honestly, you can trust me I'm a developer]"
--
the extra bit.
Philip


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]