Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> The 14-patch series may have been internally consistent and its >>> individual patches, when each of them was taken alone by itself, may >>> have made sense, but it appears that the aggregated whole these >>> separate topics took their root from is inconsistent with itself >>> in minor ways like this here and there X-<. >> >> I don't follow. It's normal for an API change to affect code that >> uses the API --- what inconsistency are you talking about here? > > I was under the impression that the purpose of the series was to > propose an API update to be used together with the remainder of the > system, not just "update code in master, breaking unstated set of > topics and leaving them behind without updating them for now". > ... About the "inconsistent with itself" bit. The other topic is a piece from the long-ish series by Ronnie, and somehow I had assumed this 14-patch series also originated from another part of that series, especially given that it is largely about refs. That's where "itself" came from. Looking at it again, this errno thing is more or less separate and independent, so your "I don't follow" is perfectly understandable to me now. Sorry about being grumpy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html