Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> +static const char *update_worktree(unsigned char *sha1)
> +{
> +...
> + const char *work_tree = git_work_tree_cfg ? git_work_tree_cfg : "..";
I overlooked this one, but is there a reason why this has to look at
an internal implementatino detail which is git_work_tree_cfg,
instead of asking get_git_work_tree()?
I am wondering if that reason is a valid rationale to fix whatever
makes get_git_work_tree() unsuitable for this purpose.
Cc'ing Duy who has been working on the part of the system to
determine and set-up work-tree and git-dir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html