Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I take that as a sign that git hasn't been exercised well and >> yet more ancient bugs are sleeping, waiting to be triggered, not >> as a sign that we are very careful and adding only small number >> of risky new code in the releases. >> > > No! It's a sign that there aren't enough tests :) > > Maybe investigate the coverage of the test suite? I know we cover most of the success (expected) cases for things we care about, but at the same time I personally find that tests for failure cases (insane input, dataset expected to fail) are missing. We do not need investigation. We need a volunteer. And perhaps a new patch/feature acceptance criteria that requires both expected behaviour and expected failure tests, but I am lazy ;-). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html