Hi, On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Bill Lear wrote: > On Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 20:52:38 (+0100) Johannes Schindelin writes: > >Hi, > > > >On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Bill Lear wrote: > > > >> We are contemplating files on the order of 500 megabytes a piece. > > > >I recommend splitting the files so that no file is that large (but the sum > >of them can be). But I think that you really wanted to say that. > > > >I think the problem of large packs is tackled right now by Troy, Shawn and > >Nico. Troy had exactly the same problem AFAIU, and Nico and Shawn are > >working on a new pack file format, which would lift the 4GB limit on packs > >while at it. > > > >This should solve your problems. > > Welll... it's not really a matter of capacity, though I do agree that > lifting that limit will help. We are more concerned with time to > clone the repos over the (often very slow) corporate network, for > example. With future ratios of about 1% code to 99% test data, we > hither and yon with little care, and a monster data repo that is > (somehow) sanely managed with git as well. I was just curious if > others had run into the management problems that I mentioned with > separating test data from code and what they may have done to surmount > them. Okay I misunderstood, then. Do shallow clones help you? Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html