Re: RFC: Patch editing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:

> One nice thing about my method is that, if you've had to make a dozen 
> unrelated changes to get something to compile and run far enough to test 
> whether any of the changes are actually correct, you can be sure to get 
> that work preserved. I'd be a lot less comfortable preparing 
> intermediate states if I didn't have the final state securely tucked 
> away.

You _could_ still ensure that by looking in the reflog which was your old 
tip-of-branch, and git-diff with that.

But I agree. That is why I commit _everything_ before rearranging.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]