On 2014-11-24 00.15, Ramsay Jones wrote: > On 23/11/14 18:53, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On 23/11/14 14:16, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >>>> gcc under cygwin reports several warnings like this: >>>> warning: implicit declaration of function 'memmem' >>>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>>> This has been observed under CYGWIN-32 with GCC 4.7.3 as well >>>> as CYGWIN-64 with gcc v4.8.3-5 x86-64 >>> >>> Heh, thanks for looking into this. Your email came at a good time, >>> since I was just about to boot my old laptop into windows XP to >>> test my patch on 32-bit cygwin! (If I had not been watching the >>> F1 Grand Prix on TV, I would already have done so! ;-) ). >>> >>> It's been a while since I updated my 32-bit cygwin installation >>> (about 6 months) but I'm a little surprised you found this issue >>> with gcc 4.7.3 (I'm _almost_ tempted to boot that laptop anyway >>> just to see what versions of software it is running). >> >> So you have an old installation to check how well the patched >> version is accepted by the old set of header files? > > ... I can, indeed, use this old installation to test this on > 32-bit cygwin. sigh, I thought I had dodged that bullet! ;-) > It depends what we mean with "old": cygwin 1.5 is old, and I lost my test installation this summer: One netbook was converted from XP to Linux, the other machine needs to be re-installed and CYGWIN 1.5 is no longer available for download. I can confirm that Ramsays patch works with CYGWIN 1.7 32 Bit. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html