Aaron Schrab <aaron@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Is there a way to do a merge but only record conflicts in the index, not > update the working versions of files with conflict markers? > > Like many people, I use git to manage configuration files for my shell, > editor, git itself, and a number of other things. The vast majority of > times that I update things no conflicts are occur and everything just > works, so I'd like to avoid extra work in this case. But occasionally a > conflict will occur, and if it's in a file that will be read while trying > to resolve the conflict this can make things more difficult. You could perform the merge in a separate working directory. The only extra step required is a checkout to deploy the new revision, which could be triggered automatically by a hook. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html