Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 06:46:19AM +0100, Elia Pinto wrote: > >> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_representation_by_country >> > [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date >> >> Isn't not so good to refer to external resources in a commit message ? > > It is not good to omit any explanation and just include a link, like: > > Fixes the bug reported in http://... > > because people who are reading "git log" have to follow that link to > even see what you are talking about (and the link might go away, or they > might not have access at the time). > > It is fine, and even desirable, to summarize the relevant content of a > resource and provide a link for people who want to dig further. In this > case, I am saying "Wikipedia claims that nobody uses this format" and > backing it up with a link to indicate which pages I checked. You do not > have to follow the link to know what I am saying, but if you want to > dig deeper, you at least know where I left off my research. > > Does that make sense? What you wrote matches the level of details I have been trying to stick to when writing references in my own log messages and when tweaking others' log messages. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html