Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a few more values for receive.denyCurrentBranch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Okay, here is my explanation: at the time I wanted to disprove that
> updateInstead could make sense, I wanted to offer a milder version of
> updating the current branch that left the working directory alone:
> detachInstead.
>
> Now, I never used it myself, but I use updateInstead extensively.

Sounds like updateInstead turned out to be useful enough to make
a "possibly more cautious" detachInstead unnecessary?  It probably
makes sense not to add it in that case, I would think.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]