Re: [PATCH] run-command: use void to declare that functions take no parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:43:10PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Explicitly declare that git_atexit_dispatch() and git_atexit_clear()
> > take no parameters instead of leaving their parameter list empty and
> > thus unspecified.
> [...]
> 
> I was kind of surprised after running a git blame to find that this
> is a recent thing, and the same patch looked quite substandard with
> numerious style violations, and I somehow managed to let them slip
> in X-<.  Perhaps I was having a bad day or something...

I had always just assumed that -Wstrict-prototypes was part of -Wall,
but it is not (nor even part of -Wextra!). Maybe it is time to add it to
your integration-build flags. :)

Looks like we also need this on top of hv/submodule-config (still in pu,
so squashing is probably best):

diff --git a/submodule-config.h b/submodule-config.h
index 58afc83..9061e4e 100644
--- a/submodule-config.h
+++ b/submodule-config.h
@@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ const struct submodule *submodule_from_name(const unsigned char *commit_sha1,
 		const char *name);
 const struct submodule *submodule_from_path(const unsigned char *commit_sha1,
 		const char *path);
-void submodule_free();
+void submodule_free(void);
 
 #endif /* SUBMODULE_CONFIG_H */

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]