On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:16:42AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > But as Shawn pointed out, Octopus makes bisect less (much less) > efficient for the end users, I tend to think the current 16 is > already insanely large. Did you look at my "why I need a huge octopus" description? Is there a better way to do it? Should I simply do a bunch of pair-wise merges? I'll almost certainly never bisect it, but the octopus "looks right" in gitk (though I have to admit, it's really not _that_ big a deal -- it's almost more readable to look at pairwise merges anyway). -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html