I'm not sure I had seen that particular thread, but it seems like we're all in agreement on that topic. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Jeff will have time to tackle that this time :-) On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that has direct linkage; what you have in mind I think is > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/234903/focus=234935 > > What is on thread here is an implementation glitch, not semantic one. > Checking out a "directory" as opposed to "set of paths that match the > pathspec" was a deliberate design choice, not an implementation glitch. > > Pardon HTML, misspellings and grammos, typed on a tablet. > > On Nov 7, 2014 11:10 PM, "Martin von Zweigbergk" <martinvonz@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Trying again from plain old gmail which I think does not send a >> multipart content. >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk >> <martinvonz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Is this also related to "git checkout $rev ." not removing removed >> > files? >> > What you say about the difference in implementation between checkout and >> > reset sounds vaguely familiar from when I looked at it some years ago. >> > Curiously, I just talked to Jonathan about this over lunch yesterday. I >> > think we would both be happy to get that oddity of checkout fixed. If >> > what >> > you mention here is indeed related to fixing that, it does complicate >> > things >> > with regards to backwards compatibility. >> > >> > >> > On Fri Nov 07 2014 at 11:24:09 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:14:42AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> >> >> > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > >> >> > > Is there a reason that we don't use this diff technique for >> >> > > checkout? >> >> > >> >> > I suspect that the reasons are probably mixture of these: >> >> > >> >> > (1) the code path may descend from checkout-index and predates the >> >> > in-core diff machinery; >> >> > >> >> > (2) in the context of checkout-index, it was more desirable to be >> >> > able to say "I want the contents on the filesystem, even if you >> >> > think I already have it there, as you as a new software are >> >> > likely to be wrong and I know better"; or >> >> > >> >> > (3) it was easier to code that way ;-) >> >> > >> >> > I do not see there is any reason not to do what you suggest. >> >> >> >> OK. It's not very much code (and can mostly be lifted from git-reset), >> >> so I may take a stab at it. >> >> >> >> -Peff >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html