Re: [PATCH] use child_process_init() to initialize struct child_process variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> writes:

> This certainly looks the way to go. The one extra question would be
> whether the symref should be included by default when HEAD is present,
> or only if there was possible ambiguity between the other listed
> refs.

Just include the "\0symref=..." for any symbolic ref you mention,
and the ref in question does not even have to be "HEAD", I would
say.

The mechanism chosen should be something that will be transparently
ignored by existing implementations, there is no need to make the
data format conditional.  If the new implementations of the reading
side want to make a choice between following the new "\0symref=..."
and ignoring it and use the traditional heuristics for some
unknown/unanticipated reason, that should be the choice for the
readers, not for the writers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]