Re: [PATCH 6/8] receive-pack.c: add a receive.preferatomicpush configuration variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> At some stage it may becomes too many preferences and over-engineered.
> Maybe I should drop this patch and then just require the plain "if you
> want a push to be atomic, then use --atomic-push. end." and we have
> simple and easy to understand semantics.

As I still do not quite understand why you find that this could be a
"convenience preference" on the server operator's end, that would be
my preference, at least until I am convinced why this could be a
good idea.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]