On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:14:42PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jeff King wrote: > > > For the most part, combined-diff (and --cc) will show the interesting > > cases anyway. But if you take a whole file from one side of the merge, > > then there is nothing interesting for diff to show. Do people still want > > to get that more complete list of potentially interesting files? And if > > so, how do they do it? I think there really isn't a great way besides > > repeating the merge. > > If you have time to experiment with tr/remerge-diff from pu[1], that > would be welcome. Thanks, that was the topic I was thinking of. It's not very often that I want to carefully investigate merge commits (usually it is when I am trying to help somebody track the addition or deletion of content that came as part of an evil merge), but I'll give it a try next time it comes up. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html