Re: [PATCH 05/15] refs.c: update rename_ref to use a transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> commit 0295e9cebc41020ee84da275549b164a8770ffba upstream.
>
> Change refs.c to use a single transaction to copy/rename both the refs and
> its reflog. Since we are no longer using rename() to move the reflog file
> we no longer need to disallow rename_ref for refs with a symlink for its
> reflog so we can remove that test from the testsuite.

Do you mean that we used to do a single rename(2) to move the entire
logfile, but now you copy potentially thousands of reflog entries
one by one?

Hmmmm,... is that an improvement?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]