Re: flatten-merge history

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Henning Moll <newsScott@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> suppose the following history
>
>     P - - - Q - - - - - R       <-extern
>
> A -- - B - - - C - D - - - E   <-master
>           \           \
>           M ...       \         <-b1
>                           \
>                           W ...   <-b2
>
>
> Note that master and extern do not have a common parent. Both histories are
> 'distinct', they do not share common files, so there can't be any merge
> conflicts. What i want to achieve is this history:
>
>     P - - - Q - - - - - R       <-extern
>
> A -P'- B'- Q'- C'- D'- R'- E'  <-master
>             \           \
>             M'...       \         <-b1
>                             \
>                             W'...   <-b2
>
> The two histories should be merged in chronological order.
> So while master reflects P-Q-R, b2 should only reflect P-Q and b1 should
> only reflect P.
>
> All my current attempts (surgery with git replace or interactive rebase
> combined with merging) were not successfull.

Could you tell us why interactive rebase did not work?
If there can't be any merge conflict between both histories, it should
have worked without asking you to resolve any conflict.

Best,
Christian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]