Re: git-svn performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




------------------------------
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 01:02 BST Eric Wong wrote:

>Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Comparing trunk of old and new, I see one difference -  One short
>> commit message is missing in the *old* (the "Add checkPoFiles etc." part)
>> and so all the sha1 afterwards differed. Is that an old bug that's fixed
>> and therefore I should throw away the old clone? 
>
>I don't recall a bug which would cause a revision to be skipped.
>I suppose it's alright now the new clone has that revision.
>Perhaps there was a power outage or improper shutdown?
>
>At least we can be glad current versions see this revision...

the old didn't missing a revision - just a revision 'message' - blank instead of 3 words, above the git svn id. I supppse it is possible some power problem or etc caused this. I'll check the other branches as well, and possibly clone again to be sure. ( The new clone did have one break...)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux