Re: Isn't "dangling" a misnomer?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Mike Coleman wrote:

> I've been reading and rereading the git documentation and tripping 
> slightly over the word "dangling", as in "dangling object".  In 
> traditional use, one might talk of a dangling pointer A, where A points 
> to B and B is destroyed/invalidated/etc.  As a literal example, A might 
> be a machine address like 0x8808FEFE, which points to an area of memory 
> that once had a particular meaning, but now does not, leaving the 
> pointer "dangling".

Think of the history as a large tree with branches. If a branch is 
dangling, it is about to be pruned.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]