Re: [PATCH] revision: remove definition of unused 'add_object' function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:36:12PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:

> I noticed that your 'jk/prune-mtime' branch removes the last caller
> of the add_object() function; specifically commit 5f78a431a
> ("reachable: use traverse_commit_list instead of custom walk", 15-10-2014).

Thanks. I usually rely on the compiler to catch any static instances
that I missed, but of course this one is extern. Did you use an
automated tool for this (I know you often catch "X has no declaration;
should it be static?" with clang, but does clang catch this, too?).

> If you need to re-roll those patches, could you please squash this
> patch into the above commit. (unless you have plans to add some new
> callers, of course! ;-) ).

Nope, I just didn't notice that I dropped the last caller. I don't think
we need another re-roll (fingers crossed), but I'd be happy to have this
on top.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]