Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Max Kirillov <max@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:09:45PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Until that problem is solved it looks wrong to pass
>> GIT_COMMON_DIR into submodule recursion, I believe
>> GIT_COMMON_DIR should be added to the local_repo_env array
>> (and even if it is passed on later, we might have to
>> append "/modules/<submodule_name>" to make it point to the
>> correct location).
>
> Actually, why there should be an _environment_ variable
> GIT_COMMON_DIR at all? I mean, gitdir is resolved to some
> directory (through link or environment), and it contains the
> shared data directly or referes to it with the commondir
> link. In which case anyone would want to override that
> location?

It's how the implementation was built up. First I split the repo in
two and I need something to point the new/shared part.
$GIT_DIR/worktrees comes later to glue them up. Keeping it an
environment variable gives us a possibility to glue things up in a
different way than using $GIT_DIR/worktrees. Of course the odds of
anybody doing that are probably small or even near zero.

Still consuming the rest of this thread. Thanks all for working on the
submodule support for this.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]