Re: autoCRLF, git status, git-gui, what is the desired behavior?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes:
It might be interesting to try this patch.
This patch makes no difference to the problems I noted in my second message where the file undergoes crlf->lf translation on commit, so working copy is known to be different than blob. Is it the case that the size info stored in the index reflects the size of the blob rather than of the working copy? Absent autoCRLF these are of course identical, but with autoCRLF they are not and what we need stored is the working file info (at least for checking dirty-ness).

Mark

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]