[PATCH 10/16] count-objects: do not use xsize_t when counting object size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The point of xsize_t is to safely cast an off_t into a size_t
(because we are about to mmap). But in count-objects, we are
summing the sizes in an off_t. Using xsize_t means that
count-objects could fail on a 32-bit system with a 4G
object (not likely, as other parts of git would fail, but
we should at least be correct here).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
I think the on_disk_bytes is a little weird here, too. We count actual
disk-usage blocks for loose objects here, which makes sense. But we do
_not_ do so for packfiles, or for "garbage" files. Which seems kind of
inconsistent.

I kind of doubt anybody cares too much either way, though.

 builtin/count-objects.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/builtin/count-objects.c b/builtin/count-objects.c
index a7f70cb..316a805 100644
--- a/builtin/count-objects.c
+++ b/builtin/count-objects.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void count_objects(DIR *d, char *path, int len, int verbose,
 			if (lstat(path, &st) || !S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
 				bad = 1;
 			else
-				(*loose_size) += xsize_t(on_disk_bytes(st));
+				(*loose_size) += on_disk_bytes(st);
 		}
 		if (bad) {
 			if (verbose) {
-- 
2.1.1.566.gdb1f904

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]