Re: [PATCH v6 00/39] Lockfile correctness and refactoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> * Rebase to current master.

When you say this, could you be a bit more descriptive?  Has the
series updated to use something new that appeared on 'master' since
the last series was posted and needed to be rebased?  Or did you
just made sure that the series applied on top of the current master
still works, even though you have been running "rebase -i" on the
same fork point since the previous round?

If the former, naming what it now uses i.e. "rebased to current
master, to redo PATCH x,y,z using the new X recently graduated"
would be helpful.

If the latter, well, not rebasing is preferrable if the changes are
still viable on the previous fork point, to be absolutely honest.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]