Re: [PATCH] Fixup no-progress for fetch & clone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:

> And how would the remote end distinguish how to split the info from the 
> progress noise?  Teaching pack-object about another file descriptor?
> And what happen if pack-object is run locally in that case?

That's true, and your convention to classify line with "\r"
noise and others as info is as good as anything, and does not
break any existing system, so it is very good one.

> How does that solve the issue with servers (currently all of them) that 
> don't know about the new sideband?

I actually happen to consider that a non problem.

It is true that you can only prepare the client and server side
by 1.5.1, and new clients talking to 1.5.0 or older servers
would not be able to squelch the noise.  But that is _not_ a new
problem anyway, and given time the server side will eventually
be updated to 1.5.1 or later.  If anything else, it would give
incentive to people to upgrade their servers to 1.5.1 ;-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]