Re: [PATCH v21 0/19] rs/ref-transaction (Re: Transaction patch series overview)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/13/2014 01:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Michael Haggerty wrote:
>>> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>>> so I'll send a reroll of the series as-is in an hour or so.
>>
>> Jonathan: Is a current version of this patch series set up for review in
>> Gerrit?
> 
> Yes.
> (https://code-review.googlesource.com/#/q/project:git+topic:ref-transaction)

I just worked through the patch series, leaving lots of comments in
Gerrit. Overall it looks pretty good and makes a lot of very worthwhile
progress. The only patch that gives me a bit of heartburn is

    [PATCH 15/19] refs.c: fix handling of badly named refs

not because it is necessarily wrong, but because it has a lot of
non-local effects that are hard to evaluate. I made a bunch of comments
in Gerrit about that patch, too, and will wait for a response before
having another go at it.

Thanks for all your hard and detailed work, Ronnie and Jonathan!

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]