Re: [PATCH v5 10/35] cache.h: define constants LOCK_SUFFIX and LOCK_SUFFIX_LEN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty wrote:

> There are a few places that use these values, so define constants for
> them.

Seems like a symptom of the API leaving out a useful helper (e.g.,
something that strips off the lock suffix and returns a memdupz'd
filename).

[...]
> --- a/cache.h
> +++ b/cache.h
> @@ -570,6 +570,10 @@ extern void fill_stat_cache_info(struct cache_entry *ce, struct stat *st);
>  #define REFRESH_IN_PORCELAIN	0x0020	/* user friendly output, not "needs update" */
>  extern int refresh_index(struct index_state *, unsigned int flags, const struct pathspec *pathspec, char *seen, const char *header_msg);
>  
> +/* String appended to a filename to derive the lockfile name: */
> +#define LOCK_SUFFIX ".lock"
> +#define LOCK_SUFFIX_LEN 5

My suspicion is that error handling would be better if fewer callers
outside of lockfile.c did the '- LOCK_SUFFIX_LEN' dance, so this seems
like a step in the wrong direction.

Adding constants in lockfile.c would make sense, though.

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]