On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:40:02 +0100 (CET), "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> said: > Hi, > > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Sam Watkins wrote: > > > it should merge the changes as if I'd run git-pull on the remote > > box, and handle conflicts in the same way. > > But that leaves conflicts in the working directory! You _have_ to > resolve them (or reset) before proceding. hi Johannes, I think it's ok for our application if the push+hook leaves conflicts in the working directory, I just want to replicate the effect of running git-pull remotely without actually having to go through ssh contortions to achieve that. It might not be such a good idea to do that in the normal usage of git, but we are using it in not a normal way, and that is what I am trying to do, replicate the effect of running git-pull remotely using git-push plus (unknown attempt-to-merge command or whatever in the hook). > Don't you have any user interaction? I.e. if the remote working > directory is only ever changed by your hook, you can use what Junio > sent. It is even overkill for that purpose. no, the remote working directory can be edited just like the local working directory. there's user interaction in the form of editing on both ends. otherwise, the committing/syncing process is intended to be non-interactive. If we were using a central non-editable repository, we could use "checkout -f" in the hook we did try that before. thanks for your help :) Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html