Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve tag checking in fsck and with transfer.fsckobjects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Still unaddressed:
> 
> - getting rid of struct object altogether in fsck (I felt this was quite a big
>   task, getting much more familiar with the non-tag code paths, and I did not
>   want to delay this patch series up any further)
> 
> - ensuring that index-pack passes only NUL-terminated buffers to fsck (again,
>   I am not familiar enough with the code, and IIRC the problematic unit test
>   that revealed that these buffers are not always NUL-terminated exercised the
>   unpack-objects code path, not index-pack, again nothing I wanted to let
>   delay this patch series any further).

To clarify: I am planning to address these issues later this year, but
consider them not critical enough to finish the fsck-tag patch series.

Please let me know if you disagree.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]