Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Dumb question (I have not even read the patch, so please just ignore me > if this is indeed dumb!): Is the map of <original-name, anonymized-name> > available to the user while he attempts to confirm that the bug is still > present? > > For example, if I anonymized git.git, and did 'git branch -v' (say), how > easy would it be for me to recognise which branch was 'next'? It is not dumb but actually is a very good point. There needs an easy way for the reporting user to turn an observation such as "When I do 'git log master..next' I see this one extraneous commit shown" into a corresponding statement to accompany the anonymised output. The user needs it to make sure that the symptom reproduces in the anonymised repository in order to decide if it is even worthwhile to send the output for analysis in the first place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html