On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:48:24PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > We can fix this by making name_decoration's adding function > > public. If all callers use it, then any changes to structi > > s/structi/struct/ I blame vi finger-cruft. > > initialization only need to happen in one place (and because > > the members come in as parameters, the compiler can notice a > > caller who does not supply enough information). > > > > As a bonus, this also means that the decoration hashes > > created by the bisect code will use less memory (previously > > we over-allocated space for the distance integer, but not we > > s/not/now/ Er, I blame vi again. Yeah, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. Thanks for proofreading. :) -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html