Re: [PATCH] run-command: introduce CHILD_PROCESS_INIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 09:25:58AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:

> >I think one reason we never had an INIT macro here is that you cannot
> >simply use the struct after zero-ing it anyway. That's just the first
> >step, and then you have to tweak a bunch of fields to get what you want.
> >So the memset is just one setup line out of many.
> 
> Some (or most?) of these steps could be converted to named
> initializers -- once all supported platforms provide them..

Yeah, I'd be fine with that, but I am not holding my breath on the
"once..." in your statement. :)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]