Re: [PATCH 2/2] fetch: silence git-gc if --quiet is given

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this is a fine fix for this specific problem, and we should
> apply it. But I do wonder if it would be simpler in the long run to
> treat verbosity as a global option, and pass it around via a GIT_QUIET
> (or GIT_VERBOSITY) environment variable.
>
> I would not be surprised at all to find that there are other cases where
> sub-programs do not respect the parent verbosity (I know we have had
> problems with progress reporting flags carried over the transport
> interface in the past, but I think we fixed all of those).

I don't see any easy way to make everybody aware of $GIT_QUIET. But
the idea is nice.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]