Re: [PATCH] mailsplit.c: remove dead code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



... answering to myself, the only invoker does not seem to care,
so I do not mind if the fprintf/exit gets turned into die() in a
follow-up patch.

Thanks.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> +    if (is_bare && !allow_bare) {
>>> +            unlink(name);
>>> +            fprintf(stderr, "corrupt mailbox\n");
>>> +            exit(1);
>>> +    }
>>
>> Not directly related to your patch, but shouldn't this be using
>>
>> die(_("corrupt mailbox"));
>>
>> instead?
>
> Doesn't the exit status of mailsplit matter to its existing
> invokers?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]