Re: [PATCH] Update hard-coded header dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> ?  People using ancient compilers that never change headers wouldn't
>> be hurt, people using modern compilers that do change headers also
>> wouldn't be hurt, and we could stop pretending to maintain an
>> up-to-date list.
>
> I agree that it is very tempting to declare that we do not manually
> "maintain" the dependency list and force people without -MMD to
> recompile whenever any unrelated header changes.  Especially that
> this patch only works on the 'master' branch and upwards, and does
> not even work on 'maint', let alone 1.9 or 1.8.5 maintenance tracks.
>
> Let's consider the merit of that approach after 2.1 is out.  Thanks.

Actually "upwards" is not even true; the 'next' branch already wants
e.g. trace.h to build credential-store.o, which is not needed for
the 'master' branch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]