Re: [PATCH] pack-bitmap: do not use gcc packed attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Am 05.08.2014 20:47, schrieb Jeff King:
>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:19:46PM +0200, Karsten Blees wrote:
>> 
>>> Hmm, I wonder if it wouldn't be simpler to read / write the desired on-disk
>>> structure directly, without copying to a uchar[6] first.
>> 
>> Probably. My initial attempt was to keep together the read/write logic
>> about which sizes each item is, but I think the result ended up
>> unnecessarily verbose and harder to follow.
>> 
>
> Yeah, having read / write logic in different files is confusing, esp. when
> not using structs to define the file format.
>
>>> Here's what I came up with (just a sketch, commit message is lacky and the
>>> helper functions deserve a better place / name):
>> 
>> I like it. Want to clean it up and submit in place of mine?
>> 
>
> Will do, but it will have to wait till next week.

Thanks, both.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]