Re: [PATCH] pretty.c: make git_pretty_formats_config return -1 on git_config_string failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:45:44PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
>> Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > `git_pretty_formats_config()` continues without checking git_config_string's
>> > return value which can lead to a SEGFAULT.
>> 
>> Indeed, without the patch:
>> 
>> $ git -c pretty.my= log --pretty=my                        
>> error: Missing value for 'pretty.my'                         
>> zsh: segmentation fault  git -c pretty.my= log --pretty=my
>
> Hmm. Not related to the original patch, but that really looks like a
> bug. Shouldn't "git -c pretty.my= ..." set pretty.my to the empty string?
>
> I'd expect "git -c pretty.my ..." to set it to NULL (i.e., the "implicit
> true" you get from omitting the "=" in the config files themselves).

Indeed.

strbuf_split_buf() does not seem to distinguish between x= and x. No
time to debug this further, sorry.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]