Re: [PATCH 2/5] refs.c: return error instead of dying when locking fails during transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>
>> --- a/refs.c
>> +++ b/refs.c
>> @@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char *refname,
>>                        */
>>                       goto retry;
>>               else
>> -                     unable_to_lock_index_die(ref_file, errno);
>> +                     goto error_return;
>
> Should probably save last_errno so error_return can pass that
> information back.

Done. Thanks.

>
> Can the caller recover from this error?  Does it have enough information
> to produce the same helpful message as unable_to_lock_index_die?
>
> If this could be done without regressing behavior (e.g., by passing
> back error information as a message instead of through errno) then I
> think it would make sense.

The callers should all be able to cope with this returning error (and
now logging error() since this function is only called from within
transaction_commit() and it knows how to deal with these errors.


>
> Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]