On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:32:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Junio, we should consider a v2.0.4 with that series, I think. This is a > > pretty serious regression in diff-tree (I didn't even realize that the > > buffer-slab work went into the maint series; that may have been a little > > ambitious). > > Or v2.0.4 without that series, which is how we usually do things, > but let me see if jk/alloc-commit-id is easily applicable there > first. Yeah, I'm fine with a straight revert, too (I think it is fine to keep in master, though). I think jk/alloc-commit-id is built right on top of the original commit-slab topic, so it should be easy to do either way. Thanks for dealing with it. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html