Re: [PATCH 00/20] ref transactions part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had a look at the changes in origin/pu and they look sane to me.

make test   passes all tests too.


regards
ronnie sahlberg


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This is the next 20 patches from my originally big patch series and follow
>>> the previous 19 patches that is now in juns tree.
>>> These patches were numbered 20-39 in the original 48-patch series.
>>>
>>> Changes since these patches were in the original series:
>>>
>>> - Addressing concerns from mhagger's review
>
> One patch in the series did not apply cleanly on top of the tip of
> the previous series (now queued as rs/ref-transaction-0) and I had
> to wiggle it.  Please check the result (queued as three topics, this
> one is rs/ref-transaction-1 which is built on the abovementioned
> "-0", and the remainder from the previous round is rebased on "-1"
> as rs/ref-transaction), all of which are queued on 'jch' (which is
> part of 'pu').
>
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]