Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 09:03 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> ... >>> >> Yes, that is fun. >>> >> >>> >> I actually think your "In 'version:pefname' and 'wersion:refname', >>> >> we want be able to report 'pefname' and 'wersion' are misspelled, >>> >> and returning -1 or enum would not cut it" is a good argument. The >>> >> callee wants to have flexibility on _what_ to report, just as the >>> >> caller wants to have flexibility on _how_. In this particular code >>> >> path, I think the former far outweighs the latter, and my suggestion >>> >> I called "silly" might not be so silly but may have struck the right >>> >> balance. I dunno. >> ... >> I agree. But what about going back to the older setup where the caller >> can output correct error message? I'm ok with using an enum style >> return, to be completely honest. I would prefer this, actually. > > Depends on which older setup you mean, I think. The one that does > not let us easily give more context dependent diagnoses that lets us > distinguish between version:pefname and version:refname by returning > only -1 or an enum? In case it was not clear, I do not think -1 or enum is a good idea. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html